My thoughts on being blocked by Imogen Thomas:
So ... I tweeted @Imogen_Thomas and @CharlotteChurch to ask if
this was theirs:
That Chazza ‘Voice of an Angel’ Church hasn’t replied yet...
Probably busy smoking outside The Asda or something. But for
some reason, the right honourable role model of society Imogen Thomas took it
upon herself to block me:
Ok so ... my initial reaction was this:
“HAHAHAHAHAHA NOT
ARSED !!”
And then I knocked out a few quick off the mark tweets about me and Ryan Giggs now having more in common than a bald patch.
And then I knocked out a few quick off the mark tweets about me and Ryan Giggs now having more in common than a bald patch.
.... But then I thought about it a little more as I munched
on a nice packed of crisp, and, well I had to ‘Ponder the Point’ of whether she
has any right to take the moral high ground over a bit of Twitter banter?
Correct me if I am wrong, but this is the very same Imogen
Thomas made most famous for being a home wrecking slag, yes?
The very same Imogen Thomas who repeatedly
managed to open wide for Ryan Cunting Giggs, yes?
The very same Imogen Thomas who
then tried to blackmail Giggs (not that I would piss on him if he was on fire
like) about going the papers with a kiss and tell, yes?
The very same Imogen
Thomas who then sold her story and caused that high court drama with the whole
Giggs Being Named On Twitter saga, yes?
And the very same attention-fucking-seeking shaft-whore Imogen Thomas
who tweeted this very picture just a matter of days ago, yes?
Oh yes, Saint Imogen of Cock, it quite clear that you only
use Twitter for professional purposes and encourage no forms of banter / abuse.
Yes. Of course.
Have a fucking word with yourself, you fame hungry slagamadagama
...
You’re just a blag Catherine Zeta Jones anyway, like... Jog on.
Another BELTER THERE JC lad..... made my day
ReplyDeleteThat told her, Jimmy lad!
ReplyDelete